10.0 英语 · 1966 · 英国 · 科幻片
朱莉·克里斯蒂,奥斯卡·威内尔,西里尔·库萨克,安东·迪夫伦,杰瑞米·斯宾塞,比·达夫尔,Alex,Scott,Gillian,Aldam,迈克尔·巴尔弗,安·贝尔,伊冯·布雷克,Arthur,Cox,Frank,Cox,Fred,Cox,Noel,Davis,凯文·埃尔登,Joan,Francis,丹尼斯·吉尔摩,David,Glover,Arthur,Haynes,马克·莱斯特,Michael
特吕弗的第一部彩色片，也是其作品中最富社會及政治意識的一部。在未來世界裡，書籍一概被禁止，讀書便是犯罪，所有書籍都要交出焚毀。消防員的任務不是滅火救人，而是焚書和捕捉讀書人。於是有一些愛書者，把書背熟，希望日後可以流傳，這些人稱為「書人」。男主角本是一個忠心的消防員，焚書是他的職責。有次認識了一個女孩，受到她的影響，漸漸改變了人生觀，發現了書本中原來充滿了靈性的世界。經過這種溫馨親切的心靈生活，使她不能再忍受冷酷無情的機械社會。最後，他偷閱書本的背叛行為被妻子告發，他與情人設法逃往另一個符合他們理想的美麗世界，在那裡有書籍的存在，重複人類真正的生活。 改編自美國作家雷·布烈伯里的科幻小說。
8.0 英语,意大利语 · 1955 · 英国,美国 · 剧情片
凯瑟琳·赫本,罗萨诺·布拉齐,伊莎·米兰达,达伦·麦克加文,玛瑞·奥登,麦克唐纳·帕克,杰瑞米·斯宾塞,Jane Rose,Gaetano Autiero,Virginia Simeon
为了追寻“生命中缺少的东西”，美国人Jane Hudson（凯瑟琳·赫本 Katharine Hepburn 饰）从美国来到威尼斯旅行。当她一个人在圣马可广场喝咖啡的时候，一位意大利先生帮助了这位不会讲意大利语的美国女士。后来，Jane又在一间古董店遇到了这位意大利先生Renato de Rossi （罗萨诺·布拉兹 Rossano Brazzi 饰），原来他是古董店的老板。后来两人情愫暗生，心心相印。然而不久，Jane却发现Renato已经结了婚。争吵过后，Jane发现Renato对她是真爱，两人坠入爱河，共同度过了一段快乐的时光。但Jane最后还是得离开威尼斯..... 本片导演大卫·里恩被提名奥斯卡最佳导演奖，女主角凯瑟琳·赫本被提名奥斯卡影后，但两人皆未获奖。
8.0 英语 · 1964 · 英国 · 剧情片
德克·博加德,汤姆·康特奈,莱奥·麦凯恩,巴里·福斯特,彼得·科普利,詹姆斯·维利尔斯,杰瑞米·斯宾塞,Barry Justice,Vivian Matalon,基思·巴克利 ,James Hunter,Larry Taylor
The last time Britain was a major force in world cinema was in the 1960s; a documentary of a few years back on the subject was entitled 'Hollywood UK'. This was the era of the Kitchen Sink, social realism, angry young men; above all, the theatrical. And yet, ironically, the best British films of the decade were made by two Americans, Richard Lester and Joseph Losey, who largely...
7.0 英语 · 1964 · 英国 · 战争片
德克·博加德,汤姆·康特奈,莱奥·麦凯恩,巴里·福斯特,彼得·科普利,詹姆斯·维利尔斯,杰瑞米·斯宾塞,Barry Justice,Vivian Matalon,基思·巴克利 ,James Hunter,Larry Taylor
ThelasttimeBritainwasamajorforceinworldcinemawasinthe1960s;adocumentaryofafewyearsbackonthesubjectwasentitled’HollywoodUK’.ThiswastheeraoftheKitchenSink,socialrealism,angryyoungmen;aboveall,thetheatrical.Andyet,ironically,thebestBritishfilmsofthedecadeweremadebytwoAmericans,RichardLesterandJosephLosey,wholargelystayedclearoftheperiod’smoretypicalsubjectmatter,which,likeallattemptsatgreaterrealism,nowseemscuriouslyarchaic.’KingandCountry’,though,seemstobetheLoseyfilmthattriestobelongtoitsera.Like’LookBackinAnger’and’ATasteofHoney’,itisbasedonaplay,andoftenseemscumbersomelytheatrical.Like’Lonelinessofthelongdistancerunner’,itsheroisanexploited,reluctantlytransgressiveworkingclassladplayedbyTomCourtenay.Like(theadmittedlybrilliant)’ChargeoftheLightBrigade’,itisahorrified,near-farcical(thoughhumourless)lookatthehorrorsofwar,mostparticularlyitsgapingclassinjustices.PrivateHampisayoungvolunteersoldieratPachendaele,havingservedthreeyearsatthefront,whoiscourt-martialledfordesertion.Increasinglyterrorisedbytheinhumanpointlessnessoftrenchwarfare,thespeedy,grisly,violentdeathsofhiscomradesandthemedieval,rat-infestedconditionsofhistrench,heclaimstohaveemergeddazedfromonegruesomeattackanddecidedtowalkhome,toEngland.HeisdefendedbythearchetypalBritishofficer,CaptainHargreaves,whoprofessesdisdainfortheman’scowardice,butmustdohisduty.Heattemptstospinadefenceonthegroundsofmadness,buttheupper-crustofficershavehearditallbefore.Thisisaverynice,dulyhorrifying,liberal-handwringing,middle-classplay.ItpanderstoalltheclichesoftheGreatWar-thedisgracefulworking-classmassacre,whiletheofficerssupwhiskey(Haig!)-figuredinsomecharminglyobvioussymbolism:Hargreavesthrowingadyingcigaretteinthemud;Hamphystericallyplayingblindman’sbuff.Thesetsarepicturesquelygrim,medieval,amoderninferno,asthesemenlietrappedinanever-ending,subterraneanlabyrinth,litbyhellishfires,withratsforcompanyandtheconstantsoundofshellsandgunfireremindingthemoftheoutsideworld.Theplay,inaverymiddle-classway,isnotreallyabouttheworkingclassatall-Hampismoreofasymbol,anessence,lyinginthedark,desolatelyplayinghisharmonica,anoteofhumanityinascoreofinhumanity.Hedoesn’tdevelopasacharacter.TheplayisreallyaboutHargreaves,hisrealisationoftheshabbyinadequacyofnotionslikeduty.Hedevelops.Thisrealisationsendshimtodrink(tastierthandying!).Likehisprolesubordinates,hefallsinthemud,justasHampissaidtohavedone;heevensaystohissuperior’Weareallmurderers’.Thisisallveryeffective,ifnotmuchofadevelopmentofRCSherriff’screaky’Journey’sEnd’,filmedbyJamesWhalein1930.Itsearnestnessandverbositymayseemalittlestiltedintheageof’PathsofGlory’and’Dr.Strangelove’;wemayfeelthat’Blackaddergoesforth’isatruerrepresentationoftheGreatWar.ButwhatIhavedescribedisnotthefilmLoseyhasmade.Heistoosophisticatedandcannyanintellectualforthat.ThefilmopenswithalingeringpanoveroneofthosemonumentalWarmemorialsyouseealloverBritain(andpresumablyEurope),asiftosayLoseyisgoingtoquestionthereceivedideasofthisstatue,thehumancost.Butwhathe’sreallyquestioningisthisplay,anditswoefulinadequacytorepresentthemanifoldcomplexitiesoftheWar.ThisisBrechtianfilmmakingatitsmostsubtle.Weareconstantlymadeawareoftheartificeofthefilm,thetheatrical-thestilteddialogueisspokenwithdeliberatestiffness;theatricalritualsareemphasised(theinitialinterrogation;thecourtscene,whereactorsliterallytreadtheboards,enunciatingthepredictablespeeches;themirror-playputonbythehystericalsoldiersandtherats;thereligiousceremony;thehorriblefarceoftheexecution).Prosceniumarchesaremadeprominent,audiencesobserveevents.Thisisaplaythatwouldseektocontain,humanise,explaintheGreatWar.Thisisahopelesstask,asLosey’sprovisionalapparatusexplains,’real’photographsofharrowingdetritusfadingfromthescreenasifeventhesearenotenoughtoconveytheWar,nevermindawell-made,bourgeoisplay.Losey’svisionmaybeapocalyptic-itquestionsthepossibilityofrepresentationatall-thevarioustagsofpoetryquotedmakenoimpactonhardmenmenwhorattledthemoffwhenyoung;theShakespeareandualityof’noble’dramacommentedonby’low’comedy,effectsnotranscendence,nogreaterinsight.Losey’scameraworkandcompositionrepeatedlybreaksourinvolvementwiththedrama,anywishwemighthaveformanlysentimentality;inoneremarkablesceneanofficertakesanAubreyBeardsleybookfromthecameraman!Thisideaofthetheatricalevidentlymirrorstherigidclass’roles’playedbythemaincharacters(Hamp’sfatherandgrandfatherwerecobblerstoo;presumablyHargreaves’werealwaysSandhurstcadets).Loseyalsotakesasideswipeatthekitchensinkproject,byusingitstools-historyhasbornehimout.